Friday, 2 October 2026

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (SLP)

📌 *About:*

◾ *Definition:* SLP is an appeal mechanism to the Supreme Court of India provided under Article 136 of the Constitution of India, 1950. 

◾ *Scope:* Can be filed against any judgment, order, decree, or determination of any court or tribunal in India, except matters related to armed forces. 

◾ *Nature:* Permits Supreme Court to hear appeals even when no direct right of appeal exists. 

◾ *Discretionary Power:* Supreme Court has complete discretion to grant or deny special leave. 

◾ *Application:* Available in both civil and criminal cases. 


📌 *Historical Background:*

◾ *Origin:* Concept derived from the Government of India Act, 1935. 

◾ *Evolution:* Term "special leave" appeared in Sections 110, 205, 206, and 208 of the 1935 Act. 

◾ *Privy Council Connection:* Originally, special leave was granted by the Privy Council's Judicial Committee under His Majesty-in-Council. 

◾ *Constitutional Adoption:* The Indian Constitution incorporated this concept with modifications under Article 136. 


📌 *Key Features of SLP:*

◾ *Last Resort:* Filed after all other legal remedies are exhausted. 

◾ *Perceived Injustice:* Usually filed when there is perceived injustice or significant legal issue. 

◾ *Conversion to Appeal:* If leave is granted, the petition becomes an appeal; if denied, no reasons need be given. 

◾ *Constitutional Right:* Supreme Court recognized SLP remedy under Article 136 as a constitutional right. 

◾ *Non Obstante Provision:* Article 136 is a non obstante clause, meaning it overrides restrictions on appellate jurisdiction. 


📌 *Scope and Applicability:* 

◾ *Broad Coverage:* Includes final and interlocutory orders from courts and quasi-judicial tribunals. 

◾ *Exceptional Circumstances:* Supreme Court exercises this power in exceptional cases, particularly when legal issues of general public importance arise. 

◾ *Self-Imposed Restrictions:* In criminal cases with concurrent findings of fact, Court exercises restraint unless there's perversity, impropriety, violation of natural justice, or errors of law. 

◾ *No Strict Guidelines:* Supreme Court has refused to establish rigid standards for exercising Article 136 powers, preferring case-by-case discretion. 


📌 *Limitation Period:*

◾ *90-Day Rule:* SLPs must be filed within 90 days from the date of High Court judgment. 

◾ *60-Day Rule:* Within 60 days against High Court orders refusing certificate of fitness for appeal to Supreme Court. 


📌 *Filing Procedure:*

◾ *Who Can File:* Any aggrieved party can file an SLP. 

◾ *Requirements:* Must provide concise summary of case facts, issues, timeline, and legal arguments. 

◾ *Court Process:* After filing, petitioner presents case; Court may issue notice to opposing party who submits counter-affidavit. 

◾ *Decision:* Supreme Court decides whether to grant leave based on merits. 

◾ *Post-Grant:* If granted, case converts to civil appeal and is heard by Supreme Court. 


📌 *Common Grounds for Filing:*

        - Substantial question of law 

        - Gross miscarriage of justice 

        - Violation of principles of natural justice 

        - Violation of fundamental rights 


◾ *Article 136 Provisions:*

       - *Clause (1):* Supreme Court may grant special leave to appeal from any judgment, decree, determination, sentence, or order of any court/tribunal in India. 

       - *Clause (2):* Excludes judgments/orders from courts/tribunals under laws relating to Armed Forces. 


📌 *Landmark Cases:*

◾ *Pritam Singh v. The State (1950):* Supreme Court should intervene only in exceptional circumstances. 

◾ *Laxmi & Co. v. Anand R. Deshpande (1972):* Court may consider subsequent developments to advance justice. 

◾ *Kerala State v. Kunhayammed (2000):* Declining to grant leave doesn't invoke appellate jurisdiction. 

◾ *N. Suriyakala v. A. Mohandoss (2007):* Article 136 doesn't establish ordinary appeal court but grants discretionary powers for justice. 

◾ *Mathai Joby v. George (2016):* Supreme Court's authority should not be limited but used sparingly and sensibly.